Paranormal Activity 3


With the coming of each Paranormal Activity movie my brain starts swirling with questions - do I see the movie and miss out on sleep for months? Live in fear and jump at every little creak of the house? Do I actually enjoy being scared, or is it not worth the strife it causes me?  Will this movie even be any good???

For the past two installments, I had been pleasantly surprised.  I went into the first movie thinking this would just be another stupid Blair Witch type movie, only to find myself on the verge of vomiting throughout the entire film out of pure fear.  I had never experienced anything like this before - a new take on an old concept.  Not just a hand-held camera movie like Cloverfield, or a demonic possession movie like the Exorcist, but an amazing low-budget combination that was executed so perfectly it was almost believable.  Unknown actors, home video cameras, and undetectable special effects.  It was the perfect movie for a horror fanatic like me. 
 

I thought there would be no way the second movie could live up to that, but sure enough it burned new haunting ideas and images into my brain that I still can't shake.  

When I heard they were making a third one, I thought - why? Why not just quit while you are ahead? Then I read the little tidbit that the film is being directed by Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman (directors of the incredible documentary Catfish... if you haven't seen it, you should.) NOW I was excited. These guys know how to tell a good story. 

So now that I've seen the movie, I can say I was a little bit disappointed, but still a little scared.
Okay more than a little scared I guess.  I always let these movies get to my head.  I woke up every hour on the hour last night thinking "What woke me up? Was there a noise? Did something pull my blankets off of me or did I kick them off in my sleep?" and so on.  


Anyway that's all beside the point.  For someone with a less ridiculous imagination than I,  the movie is a bit of a let down.    It takes a lot of the same scary "make you jump" situations from the first two films and plays them out again with new characters (or the same characters at a different age.)  


There were a few scenes in the film that were REALLY well done.  One that I will mention without giving anything away is the "Bloody Mary" scene, but it does NOT happen like the scene they show in the previews.  Brilliant, by the way, to preview one thing but completely change it so you are still scared when you see it in theaters.  


Otherwise the scares were all similar to those from previous films, and they didn't bother me as much the third time around.  I expected more from Joost and Schulman - they had exceeded my expectations with Catfish  and I was hoping they'd do it again - but alas, no.  Overall a fairly bland addition to the Paranormal Activity series, BUT with a few scenes that really make it worth your while.  


That's all I have to say about this for now! I urge you all to see it in theaters (maybe a matinee so it isn't expensive?)  It's more fun on a huge screen with loud surround sound to scare the poop out of you.  Let me know what you think!



By the way - they showed a preview of this movie before PA3.  Looks amaaziiiiing! The Devil Inside.  Check it out:


And now for some Halloween FUN:


 

Happy Halloween!

Posted by
Jillian

More

Get busy living, or get busy dying.

Wow guys.  I have been MAJORLY slacking off with my blog! I'm sorry.  Things have been busy, now that I am a grown up and all.

Since my last post I saw: Cowboys & Aliens, Harry Potter (again), Shark Night 3D, and Don't Be Afraid of the Dark.  All of them were awful!!! Except Harry Potter (duh.)  Let me give a brief rundown for you.


Cowboys & Aliens - It has been a long time since I saw this one, so I'll do my best to remember how I felt after...  I'd say my expectations were met, but not exceeded.  It was an action-packed adventure with an extremely unique plot - almost like they spun a wheel to pick the elements of the story.  My two big problems with this movie: 1. there were some serious plot holes, and 2. it takes itself way too seriously.  I think the movie should have gone in one of two directions - it either should have been more funny and light hearted, or more action packed and heavy on the aliens.  It sort of lingered somewhere in the middle.  Also, it drove me nuts that Olivia Wilde was creeping in the background of every scene for the first hour. 

Harry Potter - You already know.  If you don't, read this.


Shark Night 3D -  Wow.  What do I even say about this?  I will sum it up in one sentence:  It is a corny Syfy channel quality storyline with a huge budget.  You basically know exactly what is going to happen every step of the way.  The most enjoyable parts - actually the only truly enjoyable parts of this movie were the super creative ways people get eaten by sharks.  Even though the plot is stupid and predictable, they do a great job of making you squeal and shout whenever someone gets devoured by a monster shark.  Plus the 3D is funny - you make eye contact with a shark.  It almost feels real.
..... almost.


Don't Be Afraid of the Dark - I had REALLY high expectations for this movie, and they absolutely were not met.  I am a huge fan of Guillermo del Toro.  The Orphanage and Pan's Labyrinth are two incredible adventures that scare the living daylights out of me.  The trailer for Don't Be Afraid of the Dark made it seem like it was on the same level as those two films (despite Katie Holme's presence in the film....)  Turns out the trailer shows all the best parts.  I saw the movie with three friends and we laughed out loud through the entire thing (we were alone in the theater.) The movie was visually eerie and interesting (filmed in Australia, but supposed to be set in Rhode Island!), but it otherwise failed to impress me at all.  The story, though unique, was very dull, and the creatures you are supposed to fear are laughable. I wouldn't recommend this movie to anyone.


I will try and get better at posting on here......

Posted by
Jillian

More

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part II (and the death of my childhood)


http://www.slashfilm.com/

I'm sad to say that the one thing I have lived for for the past 14 years has actually come to an end.  No more books, no more movies, nothing new for me to anticipate.  At least they did me the favor of making the last installment in the movie series memorable, emotional, and wildly entertaining.  I had heard rumors that this was the best of all the films so far.  I can't say I fully agree with that, but it was still one of the best.  I think the past three films in the series have been top notch, and that the Deathly Hallows Part I was actually a more enjoyable film than Part II.  Part II seemed very brief (even though it was 2 hours and 10 minutes long) and very sad (but that was to be expected.)

The acting in Part II was better than the acting I've seen in any of the Potter films.  In the past the young actors seemed to think breathing heavily could make any scene more exciting/frightening.  In this film they finally learned to use their voices, facial expressions and body language to convey the proper emotions instead of just excessive and loud breathing.  I had read of a few scenes that had been added/changed in translation from book to film, and I was a little wary about how they would affect my overall impression of the movie.  In the end, I liked the changes they made.  I've learned to sort of treat the Potter books and movies as completely different things rather than compare them word for word, because I'd always just end up disappointed that way. 

They did brush over a few things that I would have loved for them to elaborate on, because for me they were the most important and memorable parts of the final book.  However, some sacrifices had to be made in order to keep the movie a reasonable length (though I think all true Potter fans would have sat through a six hour finale without a complaint.)

What else can I say? This has been an emotional roller coaster for me.  I cried through most of the movie not only because it was one of the saddest movies of the series, but because I knew this was the end.  When I finished the 7th Harry Potter book at 3am two days after it was released in 2007, I cried harder than I have ever cried in my life.  My mom came in my room to see what was wrong with me and found me surrounded by tissues just sobbing uncontrollably.  She left as soon as she found out why I was actually crying, but she would've sworn I had just found out someone had died.  In my mind it really was like someone had died.  I grew up with Harry, Ron and Hermione and had grown deeply attached to them.  On completing the book I knew they would no longer be a part of my life.  Sure, I reread the books constantly, but it just isn't the same.  Now with the end of the films as well, I have a definite sense of emptiness that I just can't shake.  I may sound very dramatic right now, and most of you probably think I'm nuts, but I'm sure that some of you out there understand.  This isn't just some book or movie, or some imaginary tale.  To some of us, it is our childhood.  I will leave you with one of my favorite quotes:

Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?   
J.K. Rowling, "King's Cross," Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, spoken by the character Albus Dumbledore.

Posted by
Jillian

More

I got me a hot date tonight!

...With Harry Potter...

Posted by
Jillian

More

Robots in disguise.



This is a little late, but I saw Transformers: Dark Side of the Moon movie last Thursday (not in 3D), I just hadn’t had time to post about it yet.  This is the latest of Michael Bay’s explosive installments in the Transformer’s series.  I hear this is supposed to be the last of the Transformers movies, but I’m not quite sure if I believe it. 
The third film starred the always entertaining Shia Labeouf, and replacing Megan Fox (telling the media your boss is like Hitler is a sure way to get fired) was Victoria’s Secret model Rosie Huntington-Whiteley.  Though it was a nice departure from the abrasive (and toe-thumbed) Megan Fox, I still wasn’t thrilled with the female lead in this movie.  I think her acting was fine - better than I expected even -I just found her character to be so ridiculous.  She was constantly walking around like she was modeling for the Victoria’s Secret fashion show, she had an insane job that definitely doesn’t exist with a way-too ignorant attitude about her bosses’ obsession with her. Also, her face was weird to look at.  She has humungous lips.  Makes me uncomfortable. 
Something I liked in this movie is the way it sort of re-wrote part of history to tell the story.  X-Men: First Class did the same thing, just not as well as Transformers.  Both story lines are flat out ridiculous, but I think Transformers pulled off the insanity better by sticking closer to the facts. 
The worst part of this movie is how damn long it is.  Watching robots fight, crush cars, smash buildings and jumble around the screen for THREE HOURS isn’t my idea of a great time.  I think they could have cut it down a bit which would have made it just a fun play-date instead of a lengthy and tiring chore.  I only love robots in short increments.
Overall the movie had great special effects, the acting was fine, and it was entertaining.  You just need to decide if you can sit through the whole thing!

Posted by
Jillian

More

"If you are lucky enough to have lived in Paris as a young man, then wherever you go for the rest of your life it stays with you, for Paris is a moveable feast." -Hemingway

Yesterday after work I made an impromptu trip to the movies, and had the pleasure of seeing a film that was literally MADE for me.  Midnight in Paris.  It combined all my favorite things into one! (The only thing that could have made it better? Sam Worthington in a starring role. Yum.)  It didn't have that handsome man unfortunately, but it did have quite the impressive cast!  This charming new Woody Allen film starred Owen Wilson, Rachel McAdams, Cathy Bates, and Michael Sheen, just to name a few.   I had NO idea what it was about before I saw it, even after I saw the trailer.  I was overjoyed to discover fairly early on in the film that it involved my favorite artists and my favorite writers in my favorite city.  Had I known, I would have anticipated it more!
It's a whimsical story about a man (Owen Wilson) who discovers a unique and mysterious side to Paris every night at, you guessed it, midnight.  Rachel McAdams plays a perfectly Regina George-esque role, which I love from her.  This is definitely more geared towards a female audience, though I do think guys will still enjoy it.  It was an overall enchanting movie and simply a pleasure to watch. 
I am going to give this movie a "not worth it" BUT I DON'T THINK IT'S A BAD MOVIE!

It was magical and romantic and sweet and perfect for a person like me, BUT I just don't think you have to spend the money to see it in theaters.  It will be just as good as a rental, or to buy and watch over and over and over again.  I am thinking of a new rating system for movies, to start soon, just because my ratings make great movies like this look bad. DEFINITELY worth seeing, just not necessarily in theaters.

Posted by
Jillian

More

Super 8... was it super great?


Today was the opening day of Super 8 in theaters, and naturally I went to see it as soon as I got out of work.  I have been looking forward to this movie since last year when I first saw the preview, so I couldn't believe the day had finally come. 
I don't want to give away any of it, because I don't want this blog to be about spoilers.  I just want to share that I really enjoyed it, and it's definately the kind of movie you want to see in theaters.  The acting was top notch - a bunch of new faces and some not so new, but great performances all around.  Elle Fanning is a m a z i n g!  Also, the movie had a phenominal soundtrack! It really complemented the movie and the way it was filmed, and made the whole thing seem reminiscent of E.T. or Close Enconters of the Third Kind (funny since Spielberg directed both those films and was the producer of Super 8) Though it sounded a lot like the music of John Williams, the soundtrack was composed by Michael Giacchino, who is obviously a good buddy of J.J. Abrams because he composed the music for Lost and Alias. 
If you read the reviews by the critics, you'll notice a lot of them think the movie sort of flat lined at the end.  I will just caution you to keep in mind that J.J. Abrams wrote this movie, and it is very much his style.  Any Lost fans out there?  You'll understand what I mean.  While I do think the movie leaves something to be desired, it is overall an excellent film and most certainly worth a watch!

Posted by
Jillian

More

Copyright © / Jill Talks Movies

Template by : Urang-kurai / powered by :blogger